Well I would respectfully disagree. I find the Crimp Hold and Recovery on the 808 is just about average. Been a while since I have tried a Hoyle stock but among other USPCC stocks their are many stocks that seem to hold out better. Arrco, Tally Hos, and especially the stock on the UV500s or the Steamboats(RIP). The snap seems to last longer and so do the decks. Some not by much but but you can tell the difference if you pay attention. And no offence but it is not just me saying it. I am only one of dozens of people who have reviewed Tallys and Arrcos and I have yet to find one review of those cards that claims the 808 is the better card. Even the Bee stock, though it is a much softer stock than the 808, seems to last a bit longer. (Admittedly humid weather will reek havoc on the Aristocrat stock so if you live in a humid place I'd recommend 808s over Bees)
These are just examples of superior USPCC stocks. USPCC stocks in general are much weaker than either Fournier or Anglo brands. Both have stiff, springy, durable stocks that will last a good long time. I don't necessarily recommend these cards for anyone. They tend not to fan as well as the USPCC cards and you would have to have some monstrously strong hand to pull off a LePaul spread but for those into learning multi-packet cuts(Sybils and Molecule type cuts) these two brands are hard to beat. The stiffer stock is also nice for many "modern" card sleights. Clip shifts, Diving Board Doubles, Venus Traps, Floop moves, One Handed Pop-outs, and other high end modern card moves are all a bit easier to learn on Anglos and Fourniers.
I'm certainly not trying to say that the Bike 808 is a bad card. But setting them as a baseline average to compare other cards off of is justified. I use them as such, Mr. Borders uses them as such, and just about every other respected card reviewer uses them as such. I think even if you asked a representative of USPCC, "what's your best stock?" they would point to the UV500 or the Aristocrat depending on what you are looking for, fanning or durability.
If 808s are a personal favorite I won't argue with that. That is your choice and I'm sure it suits you as a performer. I'm just saying that it is justified to set Bikes as a baseline for a review. Their are lots of cards with stronger stocks, lots of cards with weaker stocks, but everyone knows the 808. So by giving it a 5, or a 7 in my case, review readers will have an immediate understanding of what you mean if you rate a stock. They will know if the stock is stronger or weaker than a bike. Now whether stronger and weaker is good for you depends on your style. I just reviewed the v.4s and the Aristocrats, both with weaker stocks than an 808. Many people who have a light touch with cards will likely prefer these cards to the 808 even though they get a lower score in that area. Basically I am saying that it is not necessarily a better than worse than thing....it's a more than less than thing. I'll offer my personal opinions in my reviews and you may not agree with those, but the key is that my scores stay consistent. Thus, you should be able to figure out what scores characteristics you like in a card and you can judge from that what cards you may want to drop money on.
Last edited by eostresh; 06-22-2010 at 03:37 PM.
|